aliceinHerLand

Chinese Sixth Generation cinema reflects social reality by portraying detachment as a consequence of rapid modernization

There is a generation of individual filmmakers in China who have managed to produce cinematic pieces despite working with very limited resources. Although many of their works were at times banned in their home country, their film’s artistic value was later recognized and has stood the test of time. They are known as the Sixth Generation of Chinese cinema. Emerging in the context of China’s economic reform in 1978, which marked a major turning point not only in its economy but also in everyday life, these filmmakers responded to rapid urbanization and social transformation. While such changes contributed to national growth, they also created new forms of instability and disconnection for individuals, and these tensions are reflected in Sixth Generation films. By primarily examining Jia Zhangke’s Still Life, this essay argues that these filmmakers depict social reality and individuals’ psychological condition through minimalist styles and an anti-romantic view of life. By comparing Still Life with earlier European modernist cinema, particularly Michelangelo Antonioni’s Red Desert, the essay further explores the similarities and differences between the two cinematic traditions, especially in how they respond to modernization through themes of detachment and alienation, and more broadly, how cinema processes and reflects reality.

China’s economic reform in 1978 is known as the Open Door policy. The country shifted from a centrally planned system to a more market-oriented economy, leading to rapid urbanization and large-scale construction projects. As Bryan Tilt points out, China’s coastal cities became global manufacturing centers, while the countryside shifted from collective agriculture to smaller, private farming systems (Tilt 17). These changes significantly improved national wealth by sparking massive labor migration, raising living standards, and lifting over 800 million people out of extreme poverty over the course of four decades. However, these developments also produced significant social consequences. They introduced inflation, widened social inequality, and created new opportunities for corruption. These transformations strongly affected the emerging middle class in Chinese society, which accounts for roughly fifty percent of the population, resulting in long-term effects on both their social and psychological lives (Statista). This expanding yet unstable middle class is particularly important, as it embodies the tension between economic progress and emotional uncertainty that defines the experience of modernization.

It is within this context that Chinese cinema began to change. Films from the previous generation were no longer suitable, as the beautiful scenes became “childish fairy tales” that excessively glorified a harsher reality (Lane). In contrast, the Sixth Generation of filmmakers emerged in the 1990s, focusing on the present rather than the past, and on everyday life rather than historical narratives (Zhang 168). Representatives of this generation include directors such as Jia Zhangke, Zhang Ming, and Wang Xiaoshuai. Compared to previous generations who worked within established artistic conventions, this generation broke away from those norms and developed a more individualistic and grounded approach.

One of the defining characteristics of the Sixth Generation cinema is its focus on ordinary urban life. Films such as Beijing Bicycle (Wang Xiaoshuai, 2001) portray the struggles of young migrant workers navigating the rapidly changing city, emphasizing economic inequality and social displacement. Another important feature is the use of low-budget production methods. Many of these directors worked outside the state studio system and had limited financial support (Zhang 173). As a result, their films often use handheld cameras, long takes, and non-professional actors. This can be seen clearly in Jia Zhangke’s earlier film Xiao Wu (1997), which follows a short-time pickpocket in a declining town, using a raw visual style that closely resembles documentary filmmaking.

Jia Zhangke is one of the most outstanding directors of this movement. Instead of focusing on grand historical events, he pays attention to ordinary, vulnerable people, especially those affected by social change. Stylistically, Jia Zhangke is known for his commitment to realism and his distinctive use of “slow cinema.” His films often use long takes, minimal dialogue, and real locations to create a contemplative viewing experience that encourage the audience is to observe rather than be guided by dramatic storytelling. Jia also makes extensive use of real locations and non-professional actors, blending documentary and fiction to capture an authentic sense of place. 

To better understand Jia Zhangke’s role within the Chinese Sixth Generation, this essay focuses on his film Still Life as a representative work. Still Life is set in Fengjie during the construction of the Three Gorges Dam. The film portrays two main storylines: a miner named Sanming searching for his lost ex-wife and daughter after 16 years of separation; and a nurse named Shenhong visiting her husband after two years of only communicating by phone. The film reflects this deeper issue within modernization: when social structures become most visible during times of crisis, individuals are forced to confront what matters most to them (Wolf 593).

The historical context of the Three Gorges Dam project is twenty years after the Open Door policy. Throughout the course of Chinese history, dams have long been used by states as tools for economic development and control over resources (Tilt 59). The building of the Dam is associated with reduced land access, declining income, and widening inequality, especially among vulnerable groups (Tilt and Gerkey). Using the theme of searching and reconnecting, Still Life suggests that while China was becoming more powerful, many individuals were left feeling disconnected and uncertain about their place in society. The close-knit, traditional town culture is transforming into an urban one where people live indifferently. The town itself is disappearing, and with it, the possibility of stable relationships and a sense of belonging. 

Interestingly, Zhang initially did not intend to exploit the image of the Three Gorges Dam as a symbolic element of the film (Berry and Robinson 98). During his field trip, he learned that old bricks from ruined town buildings were reused to build the dam (Berry and Robinson 103). This reflects a broader process in which modernization is built upon the ruins of the past. This relates to the Ship of Theseus paradox. If the past is physically reused to construct the future, then it becomes unclear whether the future can still be separated from what came before. The film itself suggests an answer through its characters. When Shenhong comments on the rapid changes, Mark responds, “You’re nostalgic,” implying that attachment to the past no longer fits within the present reality. In this way, the new future of China appears to move forward without fully carrying those who remain tied to what has been lost (Still Life).

At the center of the film are not heroic figures, but ordinary people. Sanming and Shenhong are not archetypes who symbolize moral ideals. They don’t have extraordinary pasts, they aren’t in extraordinary circumstances, and they don’t possess any special abilities. One man and one woman, they instead represent ​​the voiceless working class, trying to navigate their lives within a changing society. The character’s name, Sanming, is taken from the non-professional actor who plays him, Han San Ming, who is also a miner in real life. Additionally, the film portrays Chinese people with cigars, packs of cigarettes, playing cards, or blabbering about illegal activities such as buying and selling women. The way these deviant elements are “normalized” creates a profound insight into the society of the time, increasing the realism of the shot. At the end, Sanming does not leave Fengjie with his wife, and Shenhong divorces her husband. After the long journey, they end up lonely in the new society. The very journey of the two characters is actually a satire of the Chinese fairytale motif of searching for a spouse. In real life, there is no fairytale, no romance, and no happy ending, but pure harsh reality. Their journeys do not lead to resolution, but to acceptance. This reflects the condition of the working class, who are affected by modernization but have little power to influence it.

Jia’s filmmaking style reinforces this sense of ordinariness and detachment. The film uses long takes, minimal dialogue, and real locations. Very little non-diegetic material is used, and the film has no OST songs. The actors’ performances also appear natural and unpolished. These small details together create that strong documentary feel. Instead of dramatic emotional expression, feelings are conveyed through silence, gestures, and the surrounding environment. The use of long shots often places the characters as small figures within vast landscapes of demolition and construction, emphasizing their lack of control. Jia Zhangke stands against the tide of his time, exposing the silent dark side of development: loneliness and alienation. 

At the same time, the film includes unexpected and surreal elements, most notably the sudden appearance of a UFO. It is sudden, unexpected, and illogical. Actually, the choice of using the CGI-making UFO marks the creative “Jia-Zhangke-personality”. This moment does not disrupt the film’s realism as much as it seems to. Instead, it highlights how people have become accustomed to constant and unpredictable change. The fact that no one reacts strongly to such an unusual event suggests that the boundary between the normal and the abnormal has already been blurred. In this way, the surreal becomes another means of expressing the psychological impact of modernization.  

To better understand the significance of Jia Zhangke’s work, it is useful to place it in relation to an earlier moment in film history, particularly European modernist cinema of the 1950s and 1960s. While these two contexts are separated by time and geography, they emerge from similar historical conditions: periods of rapid modernization that reshaped everyday life and created new forms of uncertainty for individuals.

European modernist cinema, especially in postwar Italy, developed alongside industrial expansion and social restructuring. Directors such as Michelangelo Antonioni focused on the psychological effects of these changes, often portraying characters who feel disconnected from their environment. One example is Antonioni’s film, Red Desert. The film tells the story of Giuliana, a woman living in an industrial town in northern Italy during the industrialization and modernization of the early 1960s. Her husband, Ugo, manages a factory and is gradually adapting to modern life. Meanwhile, she is battling a mental health crisis and is increasingly feeling lonely, isolated, and alienated in a rapidly changing society. Antonioni uses minimal narrative and emphasizes the relationship between characters and their surroundings. Red Desert tells the story of alienation. It speaks of empty loneliness, of clinging to a lost reality. The characters struggle to understand a world that is becoming increasingly industrial, technological, and emotionally distant. 

In contrast, the Sixth Generation of Chinese cinema emerged in the 1990s after decades of reform and rapid economic growth. By this point, modernization was no longer new, but already deeply embedded in everyday life. Their films reflect a society where large-scale changes, such as migration and urban redevelopment, have already transformed the social landscape. While both focus on loneliness, Zhang concentrates on the detachment caused by the theme of collapse: the erosion of relationships, the disappearance of physical spaces, and the breakdown of shared systems of meaning. If in Red Desert, individuals who can not adapt will be isolated from the system, then in Still Life, individuals are forced to adapt and have less power to question or challenge the system. This distinction highlights a shift from psychological disorientation to a more pervasive and socially embedded form of detachment.

The common ground is that both directors try to break free from the rules of old cinema and create films with a stronger personal imprint. For example, regarding color, Still Life uses cool tones, blues, and grays to evoke nostalgia and emphasize the shift from the peacefulness of deep rivers and calm water to futuristic, modern structures. In contrast, Red Desert frequently uses highly saturated colors as a backdrop for the characters, creating a sense of tension, separating the characters from their surroundings, and portraying the characters’ suffocating loneliness. Despite these differences, both directors challenge conventional cinematic forms and develop highly distinctive styles that foreground atmosphere, duration, and the relationship between individuals and their environments.

In conclusion, the Sixth Generation of Chinese cinema represents a crucial shift in how film engages with reality. Emerging from a period of rapid economic reform and social transformation, these filmmakers moved away from stylized and idealized storytelling to focus on ordinary people and everyday life. Through films like Still Life, Jia Zhangke reveals how modernization reshapes not only physical spaces but also human relationships and emotional experience. The use of minimalist style allows these films to capture a quiet sense of alienation that is often overlooked. In this way, the Sixth Generation demonstrates how cinema can reflect the deeper human consequences of social change.

Word count: 2093

References

Antonioni, Michelangelo, director. Red Desert. 1964.

Berry, Chris, and Luke Robinson. “Jia Zhangke on Jia Zhangke”. Documenting Destruction and Building Worlds, Duke University Press, 2022.

Lane, Anthony. “The Long Shot.” The New Yorker, 11 May 2009.

Jia, Zhangke, director. Still Life. 2006.

Jia, Zhangke, director. Xiao Wu. 1997.

Plutarch. “Theseus.” Plutarch’s Lives, translated by Bernadotte Perrin, Harvard University Press, 1914.

Statista. “Middle Class Population in China.” Statista, https://www.statista.com/statistics/875874/middle-class-population-in-china/. Accessed 11 Apr. 2026.

Tilt, Bryan L. “Dam and Development in China: The Moral Economy of Water and Power.” The Struggle for Sustainability in Rural China: Environmental Values and Civil Society, Columbia University Press, 2010, pp. 17–59.

Tilt, Bryan, and Drew Gerkey. “Dams and Population Displacement on China’s Upper Mekong River: Implications for Social Capital and Social–Ecological Resilience.” Global Environmental Change, vol. 36, 2016, pp. 153–162.

Wolf, Eric R. “Distinguished Lecture: Facing Power – Old Insights, New Questions.” American Anthropologist, vol. 92, no. 3, 1990, pp. 586–596.

Wang, Xiaoshuai, director. Beijing Bicycle. 2001.

Zhang, Yingjin. “The Chinese Cinema Book”. The Urban Generation: Underground and Independent Films from the PRC,  BFI Publishing, 2013.